Membership Number or E-mail Address


Forgotten your password?

By ICAS | April 25, 2013

< Back to news listing
edinburgh scotland
This ICAS paper raises questions about the protection and solvency arrangements which an independent Scotland would need, says David Wood

ICAS has published a new report, Scotland’s Pensions Future: What Pensions Arrangements Would Scotland Need?, a major contribution to the debate on Scotland’s future, its meaning and the implications for those in Scotland, the rest of the UK and beyond.


ICAS is calling for the Scottish Government to develop a robust plan for Scotland’s pensions future in the lead up to the referendum on Scottish independence and for the UK Government to scope significant pensions issues for the rest of the UK arising from the independence debate.
ICAS - the professional body of Chartered Accountants – has today, Friday 26 April 2013 published a paper examining how Scottish independence could affect pensions.
The report: Scotland’s Pensions Future: What Pensions Arrangements Would Scotland Need? poses key questions for both the Scottish and UK Governments.

Key findings:

  • Pension schemes operating between Scotland and the remainder of the UK would be classed as ‘cross-border’ under EU law if Scotland votes ‘yes’ (p 16) 
  • EU solvency requirements (as currently interpreted) would have major cost and cash flow implications for employers with cross-border defined benefit and hybrid schemes as: 
    • pension liabilities would have to be fully funded at all times 
    • underfunding would have to be rectified immediately rather than through a staged recovery plan 
    • annual - not triennial - actuarial evaluations would be necessary (p 17) 
  • The Government of any future independent Scotland should continue with existing UK arrangements for pension regulation in the early years of independence (pp 14 -16) 
  • ICAS believes that a separate Scottish Pension Protection Fund would need to be established in the event of Scottish independence (pp 14-16)  
  • In the event of a ‘yes’ vote, agreement would need to be reached as to which Government would be responsible for the state pension entitlements of Scots built up prior to independence? (pp 9-10) 
  • Responsibility for the UK’s public sector pension liabilities would also need to be established following a ‘Yes’ vote. Liabilities of £86 billion have already been identified as relating to Scotland, including £60 billion which are unfunded, but there are UK-wide public sector pension schemes where Scotland’s share would need to be determined as part of Scotland’s ‘opening balance sheet’. (pp 11-13) 

David Wood, ICAS Executive Director, Technical Policy, said:
“This ICAS paper raises questions about the protection and solvency arrangements which an independent Scotland would need. For schemes in the private sector, which became cross-border schemes in the event of independence, addressing any underfunding would be a priority for both Scottish and rest of the UK employers.
“ICAS calls on the Scottish and UK Governments to engage with business, the pensions industry and the EU to minimise the financial impact on these schemes, their sponsoring employers and the people who have paid into the schemes.
“Both Governments have a duty to engage with citizens and other pensions stakeholders to prepare a way forward, in advance of the referendum, and agree transitional arrangements to be implemented in case of a ‘Yes’ vote.”

 Case study

Alasdair is a retired member of ICAS living in Scotland who worked in Scotland his entire career. He receives retirement income from a number of different sources:
  • A UK state pension 
  • Two defined benefit pensions from schemes sponsored by companies based in England which operate throughout the UK 
  • Income from three annuities purchased from defined contribution pension pots paid via the Scottish operations of financial services providers headquartered in England 

Alasdair asks: which Government would pay his state pension?  

Would a ‘rest of the UK’ Government retain responsibility, as his ‘accrued’ entitlement would have been built up prior to independence? If the Government of an independent Scotland acquired the responsibility to pay, agreement would need to be reached about whether assets would be transferred from the rest of the UK to Scotland in exchange for taking on this responsibility.

Alasdair asks: How would the creation of a new ‘border’ affect his pension? 

The companies which sponsor Alasdair’s defined benefit pensions would become cross-border schemes if Scotland became independent. These schemes are likely to be underfunded and making staged recovery plan payments. As things stand, any underfunding would need to be rectified immediately in the event of Scotland becoming independent. The continued solvency of the schemes would depend on the sponsoring companies’ ability to do this.

It is increasingly common for people to have a number of sources of retirement income. Therefore people need confidence that any transition to an independent Scotland would not disrupt these payments.

  •  Download the paper here



Infographic to Accompany ICAS Pensions Paper Scotland's Pensions Future by icasaccounting 







CA Mag Button April 2015 


Don't miss out


Subscribe here to receive the latest press releases direct from ICAS.

Hello! Before you leave. Did you know...

Join your community